Case No 7906256 Top
Case No 7906256 Top
Given the lack of context, I'll structure a general approach to reviewing a case file or product with the designation "Top" related to Case No. 7906256:
| Date | Event | |------|-------| | 15 Oct 2022 | AlphaTech and BetaLogistics enter a Master Services Agreement (MSA) – “the MSA” – for delivery of a custom logistics‑optimization platform (the “Platform”). | | 02 Feb 2023 | Parties execute a Supplemental Agreement (SA) (signed by both CEOs) that expands the scope: BetaLogistics will integrate the Platform with its proprietary fleet‑tracking hardware and provide a $5 million upfront payment. | | 08 Jun 2023 | During a “kick‑off” conference call, AlphaTech verbally agrees to accelerate the delivery timeline by three months in exchange for an additional $2 million. No written amendment is signed. | | 28 Aug 2023 | BetaLogistics fails to deliver the hardware integration on the accelerated schedule. AlphaTech alleges breach and files a Letter of Demand on 10 Sept 2023, demanding performance or payment of liquidated damages. | | 22 Nov 2023 | BetaLogistics replies with a Counter‑Notice, asserting that the oral acceleration amendment is unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds because the contract price exceeds $5,000, and claims AlphaTech misrepresented the platform’s scalability. | | 12 Jan 2024 | AlphaTech files Complaint (Case No. 7906256) in SDNY, alleging breach, fraud‑in‑the‑making, and seeking specific performance. | | 20 Mar 2024 | Defendant files Motion to Dismiss (Rule 12(b)(6)) arguing lack of a binding agreement for the accelerated schedule and failure to state a fraud claim. | | 30 Apr 2024 | Court Denies the motion to dismiss, finding that the complaint sufficiently alleges a contract (the MSA + SA) and that the oral amendment may be enforceable under the part performance doctrine. | | 15 Jan 2025 | Parties exchange Initial Disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1). | | 02 Mar 2025 | Discovery Plan filed – 30 depositions, 250 document requests, 2 expert reports (software architecture and valuation). | | 04 Nov 2025 | Plaintiff serves Expert Report (valuation of lost profits). | | 18 Dec 2025 – 07 Jan 2026 | Defendant serves Expert Report (technical infeasibility of accelerated schedule). | | 03 Feb 2026 | Plaintiff files Motion for Preliminary Injunction to preserve the source code pending trial. | | 14 Mar 2026 | Court GRANTS preliminary injunction (Rule 65). | | 15 Apr 2026 – 25 Apr 2026 | Parties file Motions in Limine (to exclude certain expert testimony). | | 5 May 2026 | Deadline for ** dispositive motions** (summary judgment, judgment on the pleadings). | | 20 May 2026 | Pre‑trial conference (scheduled). |
By: Legal Research Desk
Updated: May 2026 case no 7906256 top
If you have been directed to look up "Case No 7906256 top" — whether on a court summons, a debt collection letter, an arbitration notice, or an online docket — you are likely searching for the official status, parties involved, or final ruling of a specific legal proceeding. But what does this number mean, and how can you find reliable information when standard search engines return nothing?
This article breaks down the anatomy of case numbers, the most common jurisdictions that use a 7‑digit format like 7906256, and the step‑by‑step process to uncover the details behind this reference. Given the lack of context, I'll structure a
| Item | Details |
|------|---------|
| Case Number | 7906256 |
| Court | United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) |
| Filing Date | 12 January 2024 |
| Parties | Plaintiff: AlphaTech Solutions, Inc. (a Delaware corporation)
Defendant: BetaLogistics, LLC (a New York limited‑liability company) |
| Nature of Action | Breach of contract, fraud‑in‑the‑making, and claim for equitable relief (specific performance). |
| Relief Sought | • $12.5 million in damages (compensatory + consequential)
• Injunctive relief to compel delivery of proprietary software modules
• Attorneys’ fees and costs |
| Current Status | Pre‑trial conference scheduled for 20 May 2026; dispositive motions due 5 May 2026. |
| Key Holding (Pre‑liminary) | The court has not yet rendered a final judgment; it has issued a preliminary injunction preserving the status quo on the software source code. |
| Strategic Take‑away | The plaintiff’s claim hinges on the enforceability of a “hand‑shake” amendment that was never reduced to writing. The defendant’s strongest defense is the Statute of Frauds and alleged material misrepresentation by the plaintiff. The case presents a high‑stakes opportunity to set precedent on enforceability of oral amendments in high‑tech contracts. |
If the case is related to a credit card, bank loan, or telecom dispute, it may be with: By: Legal Research Desk Updated: May 2026 If
If it’s a debt collection case, also check Small Claims and Justice Courts in the county where you live or where the contract was signed.
PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) covers all U.S. federal courts.
In search engine or database contexts, “top” likely means “top result” or “top of the document.” It is not part of the case number itself. If you saw “TOP” stamped on a pleading, it might refer to the “Top Index” of a multi‑volume case file.